首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating a web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback: what does an expert focus group yield compared to a web-based end-user survey?
【2h】

Evaluating a web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback: what does an expert focus group yield compared to a web-based end-user survey?

机译:使用量身定制的反馈评估基于Web的健康风险评估:与基于Web的最终用户调查相比,专家座谈组的收益如何?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Increasingly, Web-based health applications are developed for the prevention and management of chronic diseases. However, their reach and utilization is often disappointing. Qualitative evaluations post-implementation can be used to inform the optimization process and ultimately enhance their adoption. In current practice, such evaluations are mainly performed with end-user surveys. However, a review approach by experts in a focus group may be easier to administer and might provide similar results. The aim of this study was to assess whether industrial design engineers in a focus group would address the same issues as end users in a Web-based survey when evaluating a commercial Web-based health risk assessment (HRA) with tailored feedback. Seven Dutch companies used the HRA as part of their corporate health management strategy. Employees using the HRA (N=2289) and 10 independent industrial designers were invited to participate in the study. The HRA consisted of four components: (1) an electronic health questionnaire, (2) biometric measurements, (3) laboratory evaluation, and (4) individually tailored feedback generated by decision support software. After participating in the HRA as end users, both end users and designers evaluated the program. End users completed an evaluation questionnaire that included a free-text field. Designers participated in a focus group discussion. Constructs from user satisfaction and technology acceptance theories were used to categorize and compare the remarks from both evaluations. We assessed and qualitatively analyzed 294 remarks of 189 end users and 337 remarks of 6 industrial designers, pertaining to 295 issues in total. Of those, 137 issues were addressed in the end-user survey and 148 issues in the designer focus group. Only 7.3% (10/137) of the issues addressed in the survey were also addressed in the focus group. End users made more remarks about the usefulness of the HRA and prior expectations that were not met. Designers made more remarks about how the information was presented to end users, quality of the feedback provided by the HRA, recommendations on the marketing and on how to create more unity in the design of the HRA, and on how to improve the HRA based on these issues. End-user surveys should not be substituted for expert focus groups. Issues identified by end users in the survey and designers in the focus group differed considerably, and the focus group produced a lot of new issues. The issues addressed in the focus group often focused on different aspects of user satisfaction and technology acceptance than those addressed by the survey participants; when they did focus on the same aspects, then the nature of issues differed considerably in content
机译:越来越多地开发基于Web的健康应用程序以预防和管理慢性病。但是,它们的覆盖范围和利用率通常令人失望。实施后的定性评估可用于告知优化过程并最终提高其采用率。在当前实践中,此类评估主要是通过最终用户调查进行的。但是,焦点小组专家的评审方法可能更易于管理,并且可能提供相似的结果。这项研究的目的是评估在通过定制反馈评估基于Web的商业健康风险评估(HRA)时,焦点小组中的工业设计工程师是否会解决与基于Web的调查中的最终用户相同的问题。七家荷兰公司将HRA用作其公司健康管理策略的一部分。使用HRA的员工(N = 2289)和10位独立工业设计师应邀参加了研究。 HRA由四个部分组成:(1)电子健康调查表,(2)生物特征测量,(3)实验室评估以及(4)决策支持软件生成的个性化反馈。作为最终用户参加HRA之后,最终用户和设计人员都对该程序进行了评估。最终用户完成了包括自由文本字段的评估问卷。设计师参加了焦点小组讨论。从用户满意度和技术接受理论构建的内容用于对两个评估的评论进行分类和比较。我们评估和定性分析了189位最终用户的294条评论和6位工业设计师的337条评论,共涉及295个问题。其中,最终用户调查解决了137个问题,设计师焦点小组解决了148个问题。焦点小组还只解决了调查所解决问题的7.3%(10/137)。最终用户对HRA的有用性以及未满足的先前期望进行了更多评论。设计师对信息如何呈现给最终用户,HRA提供的反馈质量,市场营销方面的建议以及如何在HRA设计中建立更多统一性以及如何基于以下方面改进HRA进行了更多评论:这些问题。最终用户调查不能代替专家焦点小组。最终用户在调查中发现的问题与焦点小组的设计者存在很大差异,焦点小组提出了许多新问题。与调查参与者所解决的问题相比,焦点组解决的问题通常侧重于用户满意度和技术接受度的不同方面。当他们确实专注于相同的方面时,问题的性质在内容上会有很大的不同

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号